Gladiator commodus and lucilla relationship problems

Gladiator () questions and answers

Ridley Scott) depicts Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix) as being a Bad Emperor. menaces Lucilla's young son who innocently idolizes the gladiator that Maximus has Commodus' reign, we have to deal with problems in the sources. knew Commodus, but Commodus had very poor relationships with the. Posts about no more incest written by guildnstern. They were probably disappointed to learn that Gladiator paints a rather rosy In a conversation he has with Lucilla (played by Connie Nielsen and sister to Commodus), Maximus . This covers a lot issues with the movie that wouldn't necessarily bother. I feel Commodus didn't really love his sister the way he thought he did. . while his father took to trouble of enlisting Lucilla to help him after he learns that he I think it's shown up very well in his sick relationship with Lucus.

The anonymous Historia Augusta is filled with fabricated documents and large portions of it have been dismissed as fiction. Despite these problems, the surviving evidence does point to Commodus being a pretty crappy ruler. He was a good-looking man, assuming the portrait busts are accurate. The Historia Augusta claims that he suffered from a large hernia in his groin that was visible through his loose robes and was the subject of many humorous poems.

Busy Little Bees Scene from Gladiator Movie 200

It also offers numerous salacious stories about his debauched behavior, but these were standard things to include in stories of Bad Emperors, so they may be fictitious. Instead, he gets a rather fey neckerchief. Joaquin Phoenix as Commodus Dio says that he was quite lazy, and more than happy to turn over the governance of the Empire to an unpopular and supposedly immoral Greek named Saoterus.

But here we have to be careful. The Roman senate no longer ruled the Empire, but they were traditionally the class that supplied the high officials. Since she disliked her husband and her brother, she hatched a plot with a different senator, Quadratus, who was probably a grand-nephew of Marcus Aurelius. Connie Nielsen as Lucilla Quadratus arranged for another senator, Quintianus, to stab Commodus to death as he was passing through a tunnel into an amphitheater.

But, rather foolishly, when Quintianus confronted Commodus and brandished a dagger, he made the mistake of going on at some length about how the Senate wanted the emperor dead.

Gladiator: Just How Bad an Emperor was Commodus?

So it turns out that Syndrome from the Incredibles was right; monologuing is a bad idea. From this point on, the emperor relied on personal favorites whom he felt he could trust more than the senators, which must have alienated the senators even more. Like many previous emperors, Commodus relied heavily on congiaria, massive gifts of food, wine, oil, and money to the general population.

He also loved gladiatorial games, going so far as to participate in them personally, and he enjoyed killing captive animals as a show of his personal prowess.

Dio and other senators were witness to a number of these. Dio also particularly records an incident in which Commodus personally beheaded an ostrich and waved its head around; according to Dio, the senators were laughing so hard at the ridiculous scene that Dio had to improvise a cover for their laughter, because otherwise Commodus would have executed them all.

This way, he gains the support of the army, is thoughtful, but maybe also a coward for retreating from battle. Could he at least TRY to look like less of a douche? Maximus could still be a solider — not a general though, he should fly under the radar — who gets forced into slavery for some reason. Perhaps he fights for the other side and gets captured by soldiers. A prisoner of war being sold into slavery would not be unusual.

What type of relationship did Commudus have with Lucilla? by crystal fox on Prezi

He could now have a great deal of resentment against Rome and want to get back to his family. In truth, particularly in the early days of the Republic, you only had a chance of being in the senate if you were part of the aristocratic patrician class.

The senate was comprised of elected magistrates. Once you became a magistrate, you were in the senate for life. There was only one position for magistrates that dealt directly with the people, and even then they dealt with the Council of Plebs. This council consisted of roman citizens who were male.

If you were a woman or not a citizen, then you had no voice in politics. Senators largely looked after their own interests, and as the Republic continued they got more corrupt and self-centered. Emperors brought them peace? Bring on the Emperors! But the speech Proximo gives early in the film about buying slaves to profit from their deaths? Anyone who owned or sponsored gladiators had to put in time to train them, to feed them, to give them medical attention. If they died in the first battle, you lost out on the profit you could gain from seeing them fight time and again.

Not to mention, that these early fights outside of Rome would have been less bloody in history. By this time, gladiator fights that ended in death were largely banned outside of Rome, and sometimes the contestants would fight with wooden weapons to prevent death. The movie could give Maximus the chance to prove himself by winning fights, as this nobody from another army.

Commodus could still call for more gladiators from outside Rome. The historical Commodus was obsessed with games, particularly gladiator fights. When he first became emperor he would participate in practice fights in privacy, but as the years wore on he began to insert himself into the arena. This had mixed results. His ability has an archer in killing animals impressed the Roman people, they ate it up.

When he actually fought in the arena against men? That would be far more dubious. Only slaves were debased enough to be forced into entertainment, and someone of the aristocracy fighting in such a manner would have been humiliating to some degree. They could slowly show him growing more unstable. The turning point of horror in the film could center around Commodus entering the arena as Hercules something else he actually did.

In one historical account, Commodus had men in Rome without feet, or otherwise handicapped, chained together and made them costumes to turn them into the monstrous giants of mythology.

He then clubbed them to death as Hercules saving the people. The historical Commodus was approximately x more horrifying than the movie version leering at his sister. I thought he might have good reasons for killing his father, but NOW I know that he's a creep. In truth, about two years after Commodus became emperor, Lucilla devised a plot to assassinate him. This is what the senate has sent you!

Not to mention, that the senate had nothing to do with the plot to kill Commodus. You could say that this attempt made Commodus even worse than Lucilla already thought he was. Oh, he also exiled his sister and had her killed. Can you imagine this woman being set up as a key player in the movie only to have her killed partway through?

It would certainly help turn the audience against Commodus, probably even more than they were when he asked her to spend the night with him. Seriously, get rid of the incest, put in the failed assassination. Put these women in the mix, let them learn how terrible he is and begin to start their own plotting. They could meet with Maximus in secret and start up a plan, and take on proactive roles in trying to keep Commodus from becoming completely amoral.

I like this approach because it gives more women the chance to act. In the version we have now, Connie Nielsen is the only one who really gets to talk, aside from the prostitutes. With more of the historical women, we now get a good three or four roles of women plotting and manipulating the scene. Also, it gives Marcia the chance to be awesome. In one explanation for why she decided to help assassinate Commodus, she found a tablet on which he had written the names people he wanted to kill.

She was at the top of the list. When she saw this, Marcia apparently said: So, Commodus, this is my reward for my love and devotion, after I have put up with your arrogance and your madness for so many years. But, you drunken sot, you shall not outwit a woman deadly sober! How fantastic is that? I am on the Marcia bandwagon. Let the ladies get in on the death and assassination. Marcia attempted to poison him, and when he vomited up most of the poison, they sent in a wrestler by the name of Narcissus to finish him off.

Perhaps instead, Marcia could sneak Maximus in to kill him if we are intent on having Maximus carry off the final heroic act. As it stands, having a slave kill an emperor in the arena is too ridiculous. No matter how much the people hated Commodus, they would never have reacted to his death like they did in the film. His sister would not have failed to pay respects to his dead body. I understand the uplifting ending. After all, if the movie followed history too closely, after Commodus died, more emperors like him would take his place and continue the path to absolute and autocratic rule.

Maximus gets his revenge and changes the face of the Empire, but most people just remember him as a lowly slave. One more note on the film: Ridley Scott made the Colosseum larger than it actually was because he wanted to show off the dramatics.

In an attempt to kill off Maximus, Commodus could move him from the arena to the Circus Maximus, to the far more dangerous chariot races.

If Commodus stooped so low as to participate in a chariot race? The people of Rome would be absolutely scandalized. Overall, I like this film.

Like I said, it is entertaining. Maximus is good and fights for the people. Commodus is bad and has few morals. I leave you here, because this is getting ridiculously long and there is more I could say. Like I said before, this is a fantastic compilation of primary sources that cover all aspects of Roman culture.

Cassius Dio, Roman History. A contemporary of Commodus, he has a good account of what happened. Unfortunately, he only have the epitomes and not full lengths of his text, but a good primary source. Supposedly, after reading this the screenwriter decided to focus the movie on Commodus.

15 Most Awkward Moments In Film History

Secondary Professor Garrett G. Fagan, Emperors of Rome. Marcus in the North and Commodus. The lecture is only half an hour long, but does serve as a good summary and backs up some of the ancient sources. David Potter, Emperors of Rome: